web analytics

Rss

Venice News Updates

News of Venice, CA and Marina del Rey CA

Homeless Storage for Westminster Senior Center Next Town Hall Meet, 15 September; Comments by Homeless Committee Chair

Westminster Senior Center for storage of homeless “stuff” will be discussed at the next town hall forum which will be 15 September 6 to 8 pm, Westminster Elementary School, 1010 Abbot Kinney Blvd.  Previous time stated 7 to 9 pm.

Councilman Mike Bonin mentioned at the homeless input meet Thursday (8 september) at the Westminster School that he planned to look into the Mobile Storage proposed by the Venice Neighborhood Council Homeless Committee. He also made the statement that the City Attorney Mike Feuer had looked over the deed restrictions of the senior center, gave no statement regarding such,  and indicated that he would continue to plan on using the senior center.

David Graham-Caso, communications director for Councilman Bonin, said that Bonin was investigating the Mobile Storage Program but would continue with updating the senior center anyway.  It needed updating either way, he said.  When asked about the agreement with Chrysalis to manage the storage, Graham-Caso said that it was not to happen until November.

Although it was not to be the subject of the Homeless Town Hall held Thursday, the Westminster Senior Center kept creeping into the comments.  People kept commenting that they could not understand why Bonin planned to use the senior center. The Venice Neighborhood Council, advisory to the Councilman, voted “no” overwhelmingly regarding using the senior center for storage … the deed was specific regarding the restrictions … and the Homeless Committee had come up with a Mobile Storage Program, yet Bonin was moving forward. Bonin said he would definitely look at the mobile storage program proposed but that he was going forward with the senior center.

Many people voiced their concerns and opinions that this was all a done deal.  All said they were just told it would be used for storage and the work began. There had been no input from the people.

storage1

storage2

 

Comments made by the chair of the VNC Homeless Committee, following Kip Pardue’s take on the meeting:

For those of you who missed Bonin’s meeting at Westminster Elementary School last night, you missed the Councilman state that his plan for utilizing the Westminster Senior Center for homeless storage was moving forward, regardless that an alternative mobile solution has been presented by the Homeless Committee that could not only be be up and running within 60-90 days, but would also provide more caseworkers and services for the homeless community than the original plan and could be executed much more efficiently and economically.

For Councilman Bonin to say that the VNC failed to present alternative options when we voted down his Senior Center plan last month is incredibly misleading and irresponsible, as we had just recently been sworn in and the homeless committee had just been formed a week prior. The VNC election results were challenged and we were not confirmed by the city until just days before being sworn in, which also delayed our ability to form and confirm committees.

When the VNC finally met as a unit, I was voted as the committee chairman and I brought together a killer team of experienced and brilliant people with an incredible depth of knowledge of the issues we face with homelessness. Our team met for the first time a few weeks later and brainstormed ideas. We came up with our superior mobile storage plan (along with a workable budget) in lightening speed, presented that plan at our next meeting where it found incredible support from the community, passed unanimously and will be presented to the VNC 9/20. This work was all done in less than 45 days of our committee being formed, and Bonin wants to makes it sound like we were all sleeping on the job when the truth is that we’ve all been hard at work since day one trying to undo the debacle he created.

The Westminster Senior Center was not built, nor intended, and is legally prohibited from being utilized for this purpose and ultimately this location is inappropriate and unsafe for this homeless storage program. Whether that plan is temporary or not, it’s ill-conceived. The Homeless Committee rejected it, the Venice Neighborhood Council rejected it, the community as a whole rejected it and common sense rejects it as irresponsible, unsafe and reckless.

The Homeless Committee supports the need for some form of a storage program, but we highly recommend the mobile plan we’ve presented as the safest and most efficient option for all involved. Our plan not only includes much needed storage, but also includes on-the-ground caseworkers that provide daily services to the homeless community and it also includes funds to employ a number of un-homed individuals to assist in the program as well as working daily to keep our streets, sidewalks and alleys clean.

Around the world Venice is known to be a community of creative and innovative people. Doesn’t it make sense that the solutions to the issues we face as a community be creative and innovative as well? Let’s think big and be outliers and leaders in solving these types of problems. Let’s create the kind of solutions that inspire and influence other communities and municipalities to think outside the box too.

Thanks to the incredible members of the homeless committee who have worked painstakingly to create this plan.

Homeless Committee Wants Correct Jones Count and Proposes Mobile Storage System

homeless
Members of the Homeless Committee left to right are Sunny Bak, Heidi Roberts, Will Hawkins, Matt Shaw, Lauri Burns, and Brian Ulf.

The newly formed Venice Neighborhood Council ad-hoc Homeless Committee, co-chaired by Will Hawkins and Matt Shaw, met Monday to a filled library room.  They discussed “the count” and a Mobile Storage System.

They proposed to ask the proper City authorities to provide an official count of the affordable housing built that is part of the Jones Settlement requirement. Attorney for homeless Carol Sobel has figures as does Mark Ryavac, president of Venice Stakeholders Association.  If the required number is met, they want the Jones Settlement removed and  no sleeping, loitering on the sidewalk enforced.

The committee also proposed implementing an innovative Mobile Storage System.  Heidi Roberts, committee member, said that the LAHSA (Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority) in their “Complete Strategy” says they will consider mobile options when traditional sites are not available. Westminster Senior Center was considered not an option at the time.  Councilman Mike Bonin has since announced a meet for 15 September specifically regarding the Westminster Senior Center as a storage facility and remodeling has commenced on the building.

Matt Shaw, said mobile storage would start with two busses each containing the proper operating staff, and supportive staff, and 50, 60-gallon containers.  The beauty of the system said Shaw and all other committee members agreed was the flexibility —

busses could be added or subtracted as necessary…

the service people would be on the bus to service the homeless as opposed to homeless seeking out the service staff in various parts of Venice …

the busses would go directly to homeless as opposed to homeless lugging “stuff” to a storage area.

The committee members planned on three areas for pickup.  The system would provide a set schedule for reliance. One stop, maybe two, could be OFW and another could be 3rd, which is growing to 4th along Sunset and Rose.

For example, a homeless person could store his “stuff” in the morning and pick it up in afternoon.  A homeless person would be free to get assistance, look for work, go to work, etc. during the day.

Proper motions will be prepared for the next Venice Neighborhood Council meet.

Notes for Jones Settlement Count motion

Notes for Jones Settlement Count motion

Outline for Mobile Storage System motion

Outline for Mobile Storage System motion

Kip Pardue Addresses Bonin’s Homeless Plans

By Kip Pardue

So many have asked what you can do to stop the incredibly short-sighted plans proposed by Councilman Mike Bonin. There will be a public meeting SEPTEMBER 8TH (NEXT THURSDAY EVENING), 7 pm, Westminster Elementary School, 1010 Abbot Kinney Blvd to discuss the Venice median lot project, the Westminster Senior Center plan, and possibly the Thatcher Yard lot (that lot has yet to be specifically mentioned).

Venice parking lot

In an email being circulated, Bonin is blatantly lying to the residents of Venice and showing his true hand – HE WILL STOP AT NOTHING IN ORDER TO BUILD FREE HOUSING AT THE BEACH IN THE MIDDLE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

He says this is our “second opportunity” to be heard – an obvious lie. The first time anyone heard of this project publicly was on the meeting held March 29th. How could we possibly have our opinions heard when it was presented to us at that very same meeting?

He has maintained that there would be a “feasibility” study to determine which city lots will be sold and which will be used for housing. The results of this study have yet to be released if it happened at all. I find it utterly impossible to believe that any “study” would find that it is feasible to build in the middle of a neighborhood well within the Coastal Zone on the most expensive real estate in LA. Because we have yet to see the results, we are also unsure of the other 7 lots in the study – including the Thatcher Yard. Are others received housing? Are others being sold? If so, to whom? What types of housing will the other lots provide?

He says that the developers will submit their “plans” on September 15th but apparently, at the meeting on September 8th, he will be able to answer our questions about the plans. How could he possibly know how many units, how they will be situated, who will be housed without the submitted and accepted plans? The only way he could know is if he already has the answers. Bonin has seemingly already chosen the developer and has zero intention of hearing our voices.

The Westminister Senior Center is receiving the same treatment. Regardless of VNC vote, huge public outcry, proximity to a grammar school, and possible legal hurdles, Bonin has already contracted Chrysallis (a Homeless Service Provider) to manage the storage of homeless belongings. Our voices have been ignored.

The voices of the advocates, however, are as loud as ever. A mere hint of unrest from them led to a revoking of the BID vote. The Venice BID followed the same process of ratification that every other BID in Los Angeles followed. There was a vote held for business owners in which 77% approved the BID. There was public comment at City Hall. But because that public comment was cut short, the entire BID process has to be revisited.

Yet the Westminister Senior Center project and the Venice Median lot project have had no vote and, before this meeting, ZERO public comments and continue to move forward.

PLEASE COME TO THIS MEETING. PLEASE BRING AS MANY OF YOUR NEIGHBORS AS POSSIBLE. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8TH AT 7 pm, WESTMINSITER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

There is a big difference between offering a “hand up” and completely free housing and storage at the beach (paid for by our tax dollars).

Background

On March 29th, Councilman Mike Bonin had a Community Meeting on Homelessness. He proposed building homeless housing on the City Parking Lot No. 731 located between North and South Venice Boulevards and Pacific and Dell Avenues.

You asked to know more. On September 8th, is your second opportunity to be heard.

The developers will be submitting their building Proposals with “development strategies” on September 15th. Get your concerns heard before the Proposals are in.

How it will affect you? How many housing units are planned, managed and monitored? The size of the new adjacent parking structure. How will a disruptive “homeless encampment” that occurred in the parking lot in 2008 – 2009 be prevented from growing up again around the proposed project?

The community appreciates the severity of the homeless issues, which should focus on giving a “hand up” to those in need and want help.

Venice Homeless Youth Less than Valley, Hollywood

By Rick Garvey

I know that many people in Venice feel that we are over burdened by the number of homeless youth (defined as under 25 years old) in our neighborhood but LAHSA released the results of the 2016 homeless youth count yesterday, and  the findings are interesting.

SPA 5 (West LA including Venice) had 397 homeless youth, less than was counted in the Antelope Valley, the San Fernando Valley, and only one third the number in SPA 4 (Hollywood, Downtown, and parts of East LA). You can check the link to see demographic breakdowns.

Kudos to the folks at Safe Place For Youth, OPCC and the Teen PAD who work with this population every day. Hopefully we can get that number down even further next year.    https://www.lahsa.org/homeless-count/youth-service-planning-area

 

Two Homeless Update Meets: 8 September, Upate Plus Community Input; 15 September, Westminster Senior Center Storage Plan

September_8_Venice_Homelessness_Meeting_Flyer

Councilman Mike Bonin will hold a community input meet 8 September, 7 to 9 pm, Westminster Elementary School, 1010 Abbot Kinney Blvd. to update community on his 18-point plan to end homelessness in Venice but mainly it is to hear input from the community. RSVP to councilman.

Councilman Mike Bonin will then meet 15 September, 6 to 8 pm, Westminster Elementary School, 1010 Abbot Kinney Blvd, to focus specifically on the proposal for the Westminster Senior Center.

“The purpose of this meeting will be for neighbors to meet directly with LAHSA and Chrysalis (which will be operating storage and enrolling people who use the storage for services and housing) to discuss ground rules (i.e. operating hours) that will help make the storage facility a better fit in the neighborhood,” according to David Graham-Caso, communications director for Councilman Mike Bonin. RSVP to councilman.

Two Lots in Venice for Homeless are Talk of the Town–Venetians Have Questions

Venice Parking
Venice median. Property is between North and South Venice Blvd and between Pacific and Dell.

Yard 5.02.55 PM
Thatcher yard is on Thatcher Ave in the Oxford Triangle.  (Fence is finished.)

By Reta Moser with special assistance by Darryl DuFay

Note: If you have questions, please submit to Update and they will be presented to the proper authorities and reprinted in Update with the answers. Venetians want to know. Submit questions to VeniceUpdate@gmail.com.

The topic for the day in Venice, and obviously for days to come, is and will be the status, disposition of the two Venice City properties destined for homeless, affordable housing.

Venetians cannot put their finger on why the City would even question not selling these two properties to the highest bidder, take the money and build somewhere else and many more than these two properties would yield in Venice. These two properties are prime to say the least. They are less than a 1000 feet from the water, where only a few Venetians can afford to live.

So the people who wrote the Request for Qualifications/Proposals (RFQ/P) from the City Administrative Officer (CAO) were queried. Cielo Castro, Transparency Officer for CAO, willingly answered the questions. Perhaps, this will answer some questions, perhaps it will bring up more.

A couple of the questions have been restated to make them clearer. The answers are verbatim.

1)  What are the city’s options for these properties?

Answer: The sites will be developed into affordable housing or they will be sold to generate funds for affordable housing. 

2)  What is the criteria you plan to use for whether it is better to sell or lease?

Answer: The decision will be made based on the proposals for the site that are received through the RFQ/P, or through subsequent Requests for Proposals or Bids.  Decisions on the disposition of each site will be made in coordination with the City Council.

3)  Apparently the money will be considered part of the $138 million Mayor Eric Garcetti budgeted for homeless this year.  If you lease the property how do you figure its values for the $138M figure?

Answer: A calculation will be used to determine the present value of a future stream of lease payments.

4)  When will property be rezoned?

Answer: The timeline will vary based on the development strategy selected for a specific site.

5)  If you do not get a prospective bidder on a site, what will you do then?

Answer:  Decisions on the disposition of each site will be made in coordination with the City Council.

6) Have these properties been declared surplus.  Will the proceeds go to the 138M homeless fund?

Answer:  These properties have not been declared as “surplus properties.” The City has elected to actively leverage its real estate assets to achieve a number of public benefits including but not limited to affordable and permanent supportive housing.

Proceeds from the sale of any of these specific surplus properties that are sold during Fiscal Year 2016 – 2017 will go to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.  Proceeds from properties sold within Venice would be earmarked for use for affordable housing in Venice. 

Councilman Meets with Canal Residents about Venice Median

By Darryl DuFay, editor Voice of Canals

“I’m Done With Something Not being Done,” said Councilman Mike Bonin.

I start this Informative with that statement from Councilman Mike Bonin.

On Tuesday evening, August 23rd, Councilman Mike Bonin held a public community meeting in the Venice Canals on his proposal for Homeless Housing on the public parking lot on Venice Blvd. between Pacific Ave. and Dell Ave. The meeting was with the leadership of the Venice Canals’ two community organizations, the Voice of the Canals (VOC) and Venice Canals Association (VCA). Twenty-three people attended at the home of the president of the VOC Marjorie Weitzman. Also attending, was Josie Scibetta, president of the VCA. Mike’s staff was in attendance: Taylor Bazley, Venice Field Deputy, Debbie Dyner, District Director, Ezra Gale, Senior Planner for Projects, and Chuy Orozco, Del Rey/Playa Vista Rep. Also in attendance was Will Hawkins, VNC At-Large Officer, who lives in the canals.

The hour and a half was filled with Mike’s opening presentation and wide ranging question and concerns from the audience. Here is a “brief” summary in no special order:

—Mike gave an historical background on homelessness in Venice with emphasize that homeless population has changed. It is younger and less “rooted” to the community.

—LA has the largest unsheltered homeless population in the country. There has been an 87% increase in encampments in LA. Note: The 2016 Homeless Survey listed the top four reasons for homelessness in our Council District 11: Mental Illness, Substance Abuse, Physical Disability, and Domestic Violence. Venice, one of the 10 communities of CD11, has 35% of the CD11 homeless.

—Court decisions, especially in the “Jones” case, say that homelessness cannot be criminalized. A settlement outside of a trial to provide 1,250 units to allow the City to return to some enforcement towards sleeping on sidewalks, public land, etc. is still in flux. Attorney Carol Ann Sobel and Community Activist Mark Ryavec are at odds on this issue. The City remains “handcuffed” in enforcement options.

—There is an absolute need to provide more permanent homeless housing. The City of Los Angeles has sent out to builders, contractor, etc. a “Request for Qualifications and Proposals” RFQ/P for “Affordable Housing Opportunity Site for 12 properties. Two are in Venice. Venice Blvd parking lot and Thatcher Yard in the Oxford Triangle. The proposals are to be returned on September 15th. No one knows what they will be, nor their size. Mike has said those proposals that meet the construction specifications will be “vetted” by the communities and Venice Neighborhood Council for their practicability, location’s desirability, and type of homeless population to be served. That will be an “interesting” undertaking. There was an observation that the Venice parking lot could take up to three years to develop. This is partly because it is the “dual jurisdictional” area of the City of Los Angeles and Coastal Commission and that takes time. However, no one really knows. Some developer might have it “all together” and you could see something happen in a year or so. Time is money.

Mike discussed “intermediate” and “long range” actions. Intermediate to involved a move from 12-hour Shelters to 24-hour “Bridge Housing.” The Storage of homeless belongs such as at the Westminster Senior Center is part of this effort. Emphasis however is on “long range” permanent housing. He spoke very highly about the “HousingFirst” concept of housing with services. Also of note, a recent decision by the Federal government to terminate funds for “transitional housing” and focus on “permanent housing” is of concern. He also had photos of three projects in Venice of permanent housing.

Discussion of “housing and service resistant” homeless people. Many are afraid of their fellow comrades in close quarters, some just want to be “out and about.” Also discussed the “transient/vacation” homeless. No good statistics on this, but that is not to say it is insignificant.

The City and County are now working together on Homelessness. A multiple strategies document has been produced. It it “mammoth” in its reach. The costs over ten years is way over one billion dollars. The County is responsible for health services, the City the structures involved.

Question asked about selling the parking lot property. Such a sale has a number of number of steps. First choice on the property are other agencies within the city government for their use. If the property is sold the money will go into the long existing Venice Surplus Fund. This fund can ONLY be used for projects in Venice.

Will Hawkins asked probing questions about what can be done now, mentioning illegal drug violations on the beach as something that should be enforced. This then led to a discussion of the present atmosphere surrounding law enforcement in general and specifically their interaction with the homeless. The situations are so fluid, atmosphere often hostile with media attention overwhelming, and potential lawsuits possible. If there is some reluctance to enforcement it is understandable.

The successful work with the homeless of the Foursquare Weller Chaplains and Laura Burn’s Teen Project among others was mentioned. Also, there is a brand new program of the LAPD called “HOPE” for working with the homeless. Don’t know much about it.

The Business Improvement District (BID) program, with 74% participation, will be approved.

It was a good and informative meeting. And, use of the word complex to describe it is an understatement.

Mike announced that he will have another community-wide meeting at Westminster School on Homelessness in early September.

OFW Clutter

OFW

This pile of “stuff” on Ocean Front Walk (OFW) looked like an extension of the garbage can on the left, but then after a closer look, a man could be seen amongst the “stuff.”

Homeless money figures abound … Proposition H — The wrong way to fix homelessness in LA

There is the 138 million that Mayor Eric Garcetti dedicated for the 1 July 2016 budget. Much of the monies for this will be coming from the lease/sale of surplus property such as the Venice median and the Thatcher Yard.

Beyond this year, the local government agencies have estimated that a two-billion budget is a necessity for the next 10 years to build housing. Services necessary to sustain and help the homeless is not part of the two-billion.

Mark Ryavec, Jack Humphreville, and Jay Handel  have had an opinion piece published in the LA Times. Its title is “The wrong way to fix homelessness in LA.”

Sobel Writes VNC Board that Ryavec Motion Figures Are Incorrect

Attorney Carol Sobel has written to the Venice Neighborhood Council asking the board to consider the facts, the numbers involving the Ryavec motion regarding suspension of the Jones Settlement and reenforcement of LAMC 41.18(d).

Carol Sobel believes the figures Mark Ryavec is relying on for his motion are incorrect and furthermore that the City figures which he bases his figures on are incorrect as well.

She further states that using these figures “would put the City at risk of losing considerable federal funding necessary to build the housing LA so desperately needs to address the ever increasing problem the City faces.  The federal Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) is imposing a point penalty on applications from government entities that implement policies of  criminalizing homelessness.”

The Jones settlement, which Carol Sobel and the ACLU effected,  required the City to suspend enforcement of LAMC 41.18(d) between the hours of 9 pm and 6 am until 1250 units of Permanent and Supportive Housing (PSH) was created.  Of the 1250 units, half were required to be created in Skid Row or in the adjacent downtown area.

Below is Carol Sobel’s letter to the Venice Neighborhood Council along with supportive documents.

Sobel1

sobel2

sobel3

sobel4

sobel5

sobel6

sobel7

sobel8