web analytics

Rss

Venice News Updates

News of Venice, CA and Marina del Rey CA

What is happening at the Venice Beach park, west side of Ocean Front Walk?

Where grassy knolls were filled with homeless not too many months ago, empty grassy knolls were found, albeit the grass was dying but most of the knolls were empty of encampments.

All photos in this story were taken Friday, 24 April, early afternoon. It is true that the beach is cleaned every last Friday of the month since Councilman Mike Bonin took office. This was the last Friday of month but it has never seemed to make that much difference before.

main park

noencampments

On one grassy knoll there were actually children at play. They had been doing summersaults down the hill until they saw the camera. What a refreshing scene.

One of the pergolas actually had a vacationing couple relaxing and enjoying the scene.

One could even see the wavy tile park displaying the murals of old in Venice at Rose.

sumersault

Percola with Visitors

mural park

Two encampments remained, one at Park Place and one at Westminster and a couple of the pergolas still were occupied.

There was a definite police presence. Update watched as one policeman stopped a skateboarder racing down the OFW to slow him down. Too bad he hadn’t stopped the guy who later ran into a sightseer before she got hit. She is shown rubbing her ankle as skateboarder in shorts talks to friend.

skateboard

All in all, there seemed to be a different atmosphere prevalent. It appeared to be one of transition-from encampment to public park.

Even the vendors on west side seemed to be fewer. Many of the vendors had been selling things that were not authorized according to the LAMC 42.15.

Claudia Martin, neighborhood prosecutor for the City Attorney’s office obtained a conviction last year that showed vendors were selling unauthorized products. Since last May, the police have been culling out the unauthorized vendors.

Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 42.15 allocates 205 spaces on west side of boardwalk and further defines their usage to:

1) Persons who engage in traditional expressive speech and petitioning activities, such as newspapers, leaflets, pamphlets, bumper stickers, patches and/or buttons.

2) Persons can vend the following items which have been created, written or composed, such as books, audio, video, or other recordings of their performances, paintings, photographs, prints, sculptures, or any other item that is inherently communicative and is of nominal value or utility apart from its communication.

3) Although an item may have some expressive purpose, it will be deemed to have more than nominal utility apart from its communication if it has a common and dominant non-expressive purpose. Examples of items that have more than nominal utility apart from their communication and thus are subject to the Vending ban under the provision of the Section 42.15, include but are not limited to, the following: housewares, appliances, articles of clothing, sunglasses, auto parts, oils, incense, perfume, crystals, lotions, candles, jewelry, toys and stuffed animals.

4) Performers can perform.

OFW Gets Swan Lake Diva

ballerina

Charming, budding ballerina dances Ocean Front Walk to the silent tune of Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake. Her parents said she is acting out the lead. Shoppers stood aside to allow this little girl her stage.

BONIN CALLS FOR MORE HOUSING OPTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS

LOS ANGELES – In an effort to house more people living on the streets, Councilmember Mike Bonin today introduced a package of motions to address the huge gap between the numbers of homeless people in Los Angeles and the number of housing units available to them.

Bonin’s motions, which were seconded by Councilmember Jose Huizar, request that the Council’s new Ad Hoc Committee on Homelessness examine more humane alternatives to the growing number encampments in Los Angeles and explore the possibility of incentivizing or requiring that more affordable units be set aside for the homeless. A third motion also directs city staff to negotiate with the County of Los Angeles over participating in a successful program to house the chronically homeless.

“The Los Angeles area is housing more people than it ever has, and yet we are seeing a growth in homelessness in neighborhoods around the City,” Bonin said. “We need to look at every possible proposal to increase the supply of housing and the amount of services available to people living on our streets.”

Bonin introduced his motions the same day the City Council formed its new Ad Hoc Committee on Homelessness, to be chaired by Huizar, with Bonin serving as vice-chair. Bonin’s action also comes on the heels of a sobering study by the City Administrative Officer, showing that City spends at least $100 million per year dealing with homelessness, but lacks a strategy or plan to use the money wisely.

“Our new Ad Hoc Committee on Homelessness will bring focused attention to addressing homelessness and Councilmember Bonin’s motions will allow us to engage in some of the necessary and important dialogue that is critical to our efforts,” said Huizar. “I look forward to hearing them and partnering with Councilmember Bonin on these and other objectives to address what has become a City crisis.”

The motions all address the gap between the supply of housing for the homeless, and the enormous demand:

Sidewalks v. Housing and Shelter – For nearly a decade, the City of Los Angeles has been bound by the Jones Settlement, the result of a lawsuit contending it is cruel and unusual punishment to forbid people from sleeping on the street if there not enough housing or shelter. As part of the legal agreement, the City has effectively allowed sidewalk homeless encampments to spring up throughout the City. The Bonin motion asks city officials to explore whether the constitutional mandate could be better met by providing alternatives to sleeping on the sidewalk — such as shared housing, bridge housing, or transitional shelters.

“It is unconscionable that our default policy is to tell 29,000 people to sleep on the sidewalk,” Councilman Bonin said. “We have effectively created a city of encampments, and we have focused our policy discussion on the right to sleep on the street. That does a disservice to people who are homeless, and it does a disservice to our neighborhoods. We need to raise the bar of our policy and of our humanity and spend more time, energy and money accommodating the right to sleep in housing, and the right to shelter.”

Units for the Coordinated Entry System – In recent years, government agencies, philanthropic organizations, businesses and individuals have rallied behind the principle of “Housing First,” and have worked together to develop a “Coordinated Entry System (CES)” to help move people from the streets and into housing and proper services. Huizar and Bonin introduced an earlier motion to make CES an official City policy. The strategy is smart and promising, but relies on an adequate supply of available housing, which does not yet exist. Bonin’s second motion asks officials to determine if the City can require or incentivize that affordable housing units being built as a result of state “density bonuses” can be used for the placement of homeless people via CES.

Flexible Housing Program – The County of Los Angeles has a successful program, granting rapid housing to homeless people who are frequent users of the County’s Department of Health Services. The program saves the County money, and helps house the chronically homeless. With some Los Angeles Fire Department and Los Angeles Police Department units facing significant call loads to respond to homeless people in distress, Bonin’s third motion asks the City Administrative Officer to negotiate with the County to determine if the City can buy into the “Flexible Housing Subsidy Pool,” or start a pilot program in certain neighborhoods with large chronic homeless populations.

Comments–27 April 2015

Jay Bernie
Response to Betsy Goldman and Lucky:
Roscoe, my 95 pound Cane Corso (Italian Mastiff) and I are often amazed at the fearlessness with which most skateboarders approach. Although he doesn’t care in the least, I believe he looks like he would. I usually avoid shouting as they whiz by because I’m not sure if it would do any good. Besides, I don’t want to sound like an angry old guy. Hell, I even had a skateboard when I was young. Although we had no helmets or pads back then, I managed to live this long by being careful. Instead of getting upset, just remember Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin. Survival of the fittest.

Reply to Darlene Davis:
This hoax about cell phone numbers going public dates back to 2006. Please check your facts before forwarding advice.
You can learn more here:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp

Heather Kahler
Seriously??? Does anyone care about the greater public? Kids? Families? VALUES? VNC, what the heck???? I’m not prude by any means and am extremely liberal and am a third generation Venice resident raising the fourth, but there is no threshold or line anymore. It is unnecessary. On a heavy populated beach with the needs of multiple people ignored for few who feel the need to free-boob it. The jiggling bottoms protruding from the dental floss of G-strings is hard enough to endure, and I’m in shape enough to wear a bikini myself so it’s not body envy for of you who are going there as you read. Geez. Why must we continually accommodate the desires of the few over the needs of the many? My guess is mostly men responded to the poll at the bottom of the article. Venice/Westside has all these things to boast over the last decade: Several strip clubs, pot shops more abundant than Starbucks, increased vagrant population, gridlock traffic, more liquor licenses that just about anywhere, and we must now endure boobies flying about by attention seeking women? Wow. Find a higher set of priorities ladies. We can’t have a DOG beach but instead we may have a BOOBIE BEACH! Priorities are so out of whack anymore it boggles my mind. I wish people with so much passion could put their lobbying efforts towards something meaningful that improves the quality of life for others instead of just themselves. Put your bobbies away and fight for education or the environment or something!!!!

Anonymous
REMEMBER Cell Phone Numbers Go Public this month!

This is an urban legend that has been passed along for over a decade now.
PLEASE CHECK OUT ‘WARNINGS” LIKE THIS BEFORE POSTING THEM at sites like Snopes.com, urbanlegends.about.com, or truthorfiction.com
I takes about ten seconds. While well-intentioned, there is no need to alarm people for no good reason

http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/cell411.asp

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/business/a/cell_directory.htm

Cell Phone Numbers Are Going Public in a National Directory-Fiction!

Roxanne Brown

YOU TUBE VIDEO is powerful. This is what our police do – arrest a man for having an umbrella and quoting scripture on the beach – a lot of religious right Americans do that – what if Sarah Palin did that? I’m so proud of the woman who videoed this and the people who said this is wrong. Maybe next time, a group can surround the man – but would they get tasered? Probably.

That required several tasers and the man moaning and bleeding and being dragged off? – And required several policemen and their vehicles? We the taxpayers paid for this? When developers are building without permits, parking cars without permits and our Councilman, Mike Bonin is overturning what the West LA Planning Commissioners have ruled? Venice is in crisis.

Keep Neighborhoods First
Here is a link to the Just released Santa Monica City Council Staff Report to “establish regulations for short-term rentals of a portion of a unit by the owner or tenant occupant.

This report will be presented and discussed at the Santa Monica City Council meeting 28 April as Agenda item 7-A.
http://www.smgov.net/departments/council/agendas/2015/20150428/s2015042807-A.pdf

Scott Myklebust
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/04/harrowingly-road-rage-against-bike-rider-caught-on-video/

Reta Moser
Email version of Venice Update. Have been removing names of those who have not opened the Update for couple of months. Checked with Nick Antonicello recently because Constant Contact records showed he was not opening such. He said he did. Apparently the system that Constant Contact has is not perfect. One time I removed 50 names and continuously cull the supposed non-openers.

Please let me know if you have been removed and do read it or did read it until your name was removed. Will notify people prior to removing their names from now on. Sorry.

Nudity at the beach. It is hard for me to equate an “equality” issue with baring the boobs. I liked what our Councilman Mike Bonin had to say about tit … we just have so many more important issues. Also liked what former President of VNC Linda Lucks had to say. Erin Darling had a good comment in LA Times regarding the relevance of such.

Venice Wants to go Topless; Venice Wants Equality?

The Venice Neighborhood Council voted 12-2-2 Tuesday to resolve that the City and County allow women to go topless at the Venice beach.

See LA Times story.

Peddle to Your Desires

pedicab

Entrepreneur John Berry will peddle you around town to your heart’s desire. Captured here on Abbot Kinney in front of Hal’s at 9 am just waiting for the action. Beats the parking situation on Abbot Kinney and the beach. It is $30 for half an hour and $50 per hour. Phone is 310-697-9494.

SB608—Yes or No?

P1040133

Senate Bill 608, the Right to Rest Act, introduced by Senator Carol Liu the last of February, would protect the rights of homeless people to move freely, rest, eat, and perform religious observations in public space as well as protect their right to occupy a legally parked motor vehicle.

The bill has become a “two-year bill” and will be heard again in January at the Senate Transportation & Housing Committee. Oregon, Hawaii, and Colorado are also considering similar legislation. This bill would greatly affect Venice in that homeless could not be removed from sidewalks, parks, and other pubic spaces at any hour.

Marie Rumsey, legislative staff for Central City Association, announced Friday that the City Council’s Rules Committee unanimously supported the opposition resolution to SB 608. Central City Association is a collection of major property owners in downtown Los Angeles.

Mark Ryavec’s story on 8 March in LA Times explains the proposed bill and its ramifications.

Assembly Member Autumn R. Burke , District 62

Senator Benjamin Allen, District 26

Biker,S’boarder rules of the road–are you kidding!

Note: This article was first printed 21 June 2014 and is reprinted here for sake of perhaps saving someone’s life. Things have not gotten better since June of last year.

    There were many pictures and examples for each situation but pictures and examples have been omitted for sake of brevity. Readers have their own examples of bad conduct in mind that will flash pictures. No need to add more. Readers know what is going on here.

    Most of the California Vehicle Codes (CVC) were taken from Department of Transportations’ website, bicycleLA.org. Municipal codes were taken from the LAMC website. Captain Brian Johnson, formerly of Pacific Division, provided the change to CVC 21650 regarding crosswalks.

Are pedestrians endangered?
All pedestrians in this area know they are an endangered species trying to walk these once friendly, quiet cement paths called sidewalks. Now, the sidewalk stroller is bombarded by unruly skateboaders and bikers on a mission. Is the pedestrian destined to become extinct? That is another question.

Are vehicle drivers endangered–or at least their insurance, their sanity?
Vehicle drivers are in increasing danger from bikers who flaunt the rules in front of drivers just to get ahead of some other vehicle. Bikers, who obviously don’t know the rules of the road or just ignore them, jot in and out of traffic as they see fit causing cars to suddenly stop to save the rule-offending biker. Whose insurance is it that is in jeopardy? One would ask whose life is at stake, but we all know, and yet the biker continues to taunt and test the driver.

A Sunday stroll to the water or to visit a neighborhood with a friend or with an animal is on its way out. The motorists’ sanity and insurance is in severe danger too. Bikers and skateboarders are the ones causing this.

Don’t know how it is in other parts of town, but west of Lincoln in Venice with 16 M tourists a year and a congested set of roadways, it is chaos! Just plain chaos. Severe, endangering chaos.

Bikers and skateboarders are not following the rules laid down for them. They are both everywhere endangering themselves and others. Area has beautiful bike paths. Major streets have been greened for their pleasure. Yet, they continue to ride on a sidewalk, ride on a road paralleling a bike path.

This article has the official rules for bikers and skateboarders.

To the right of the road, stop at the sign, stop at the light
Both bikers and skateboarders must follow the vehicle rules of the road and stay to the right of the road, ride with the flow of traffic, and must stop at all stop signs and lights. They should also be giving hand signals … really!!!

Bikers-CVC21650
Bicyclist must travel on the right side of the roadway in the direction of traffic.

Bikers –CVC 21200
Bicyclists have all the rights and responsibilities of vehicle drivers.

Skateboarders-LAMC 56.15.1(c)2.
Traffic Controls. Persons riding on skateboards on public roadways shall obey all speed limits, stop signs, signal lights, and other traffic controls that govern right-of-way. .

Skateboarders-LAMC 56.15.1(c)3
Yielding to traffic in same direction. Persons riding on skateboards on public roadways shall ride close to the far-right edge of the roadway, and shall yield to vehicles approaching from the rear by moving to the right curb or shoulder of the roadway.

How many bikers and skateboarders do you see abiding by these simple rules? How many bikers and skateboarders do you see weaving thru traffic like a string blowing in the wind? Do they have to walk their bike at an intersection? Ask two policemen. If you get two different answers, you will be joining the chaos.

Stopping at a stop sign is a useless waste of time to both. How many have you seen of either skateboarders or bikers who do such. Ever see anyone give a hand turning signal? In fact, there is a movement by bikers to be allowed to slow down and cruise thru all stop signs.

Even though I just listed a couple rules for skateboarders, there are no rules for skateboarders according to skateboarders. They have grown up being king of the sidewalk and the road. Seeing people jump off the sidewalk is one of the joys of boarding apparently. Weaving thru vehicle traffic is an adrenalin trip. They love to see vehicle drivers suddenly go pale when they pop up in front of a car.

On the Sidewalk
Bikers and skateboarders can ride on the sidewalk but they must yield to pedestrians. What does that mean? Have you ever seen a biker or skateboarder yield to a pedestrian? Does yielding mean shouting obscenities at a pedestrian, running into them, making them jump off the curb into street, or gather their kids or animals to provide the perpetrator a safe passage?

LAMC 56.15.1 States:

No person shall ride, operate or use a bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, cart, wagon, wheelchair, roller skates, or any other device moved exclusively by human power on a sidewalk, bikeway or boardwalk in a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property. (Amended by ordinance 166,189.)

“Willful or wanton” … now what does that translate to? Is that enforceable? Does a policeman have to be there and witness the pedestrian hovering on the fence or his blood splashing on the sidewalk? This is a subjective statement, not something legal and binding in court without blood and witnesses.

Crosswalks-Walk or Ride thru
Does all this “wanton and willful” mean he walks his bike at the intersection or does it mean he rides his bike thru the intersection? Skateboards do not have such a distinction for using the pedestrian crosswalk.

CVC 21650 (g) was added in 2013

This section does not prohibit the operation of bicycles on any shoulder of a highway, on any sidewalk, on any bicycle path within a highway, or along any crosswalk or bicycle path crossing, where the operation is not otherwise prohibited by this code or local ordinance.

The tax payers have given bikers million-dollar bike paths, yet bikers ride on the sidewalk. They ride on Admiralty Way where less than 100 feet there is a bike path. Why do they do that? If they were a car going 20 mph in a 40- to 45-mph zone, they would get a ticket. They ride on the road in groups slowing down traffic and endangering vehicles trying to pass. Law says ride to the right. The City has even eliminated a vehicle traffic lane in some areas of town to give bikers a right of way. Yet, they ride on the sidewalks and unauthorized streets when a bike path is assessable.

How many readers have tried to enter an intersection and had a biker fly the wrong way off a sidewalk and stop you? How many have had accidents caused by such action?

It goes on and on and on but it is becoming critical to the sanity of the vehicle driver and the safety of the biker and the skateboarder. The rules of “willful and wanton” lack legality and definity. The biker and skateboarder do not abide by any of the rules. Perhaps, they don’t know the rules or want to know the rules.

It is Update’s Opinion that:

    the Council Office should take action to prohibit bikes and skateboards from the sidewalks west of Lincoln. Note: Am sure Councilman Mike Bonin is thinking “Are you kidding?”

    the County should prohibit bikers from Admiralty Way. There is a bike path available less than 100 feet. Note: Carol Baker, Division Chief, Community and Marketing Services for Beaches and Harbors, said that will never happen.

    the police should enforce the biker and skateboarder laws to keep them on right side of road and stopping at traffic signs, and of course, when they see a biker confronting a walker on sidewalk enforce “willful and wanton.” Note: Los Angeles Police Division officers have many more things to do than ticket bikers.)

Both Councilman Mike Bonin and Mayor Eric Garcetti speak of “bicycle use” and “neighborly neighborhoods.” Mayor Garcetti selected Seleta Reynolds, who was previously with the San Francisco “Livable Streets” office, to head the Los Angeles Department of Transportation.

Let’s work together to bring order out of chaos.

Let’s make a concentrated effort to put bikes and skateboarders on the bike path and abiding by the stop lights and going with the flow of traffic on the streets. Let’s get pedestrians back on the sidewalks. Let’s make neighborhoods neighborly again. Let’s give vehicle drivers a break instead of an obstacle course.

Biker Rules–California Vehicle Code (CVC)

Bicyclist Rights (CVC 21200) Bicyclists have all the rights and responsibilities of vehicle drivers.

Alcohol and Drugs (CVC 21200.5) It is against the law to ride a bicycle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

Equipment (CVC 21202 and 21204) Bicycles must be equipped with at least a brake which allows operators to execute to a wheelskid on dry, level, clean pavement. Handlebars must not be higher than the rider’s shoulders. Bicycles must be small enough for the rider to stop, support it with one foot on the ground, and restart safely. At night bicycles must be equipped with a white headlight or white light attached to the rider and visible from the front. Bicycles must also have a rear red reflector and white or yellow pedal reflectors. There must be a white or yellow reflector on the front of the bicycle visible from the side, and a red or white reflector on the rear of the bicycle visible from the side. All riders must have a permanent, regular seat. Bicycle passengers under 40 lbs. must have a seat which retains them in place and protects them from moving parts.

Use of the Roadway (CVC 21202) Bicycles traveling slower than the normal speed of traffic must ride as close to the right side of the road as practicable except: when passing, preparing for a left turn, to avoid hazards and dangerous conditions or if the lane is too narrow.

Hitching Rides (CVC 21203) Bicyclists may not hitch rides on vehicles.

Carrying Articles (CVC 21205) Bicyclists may not carry items which keep them from using at least one hand upon the handlebars.

Motorized Bicycles (CVC 21207.5) Motorized bicycles may not be used on trails, bike path, or lanes.
Note: Motorized does not include electric vehicles.

Bicycle Lane Use (CVC 21208) Bicyclists traveling slower than traffic must use bike lanes except when making a left turn, passing, or avoiding hazardous conditions.

Obstruction of Pedestrians (CVC 21210) Bicyclists may not leave bicycles on their sides on the sidewalk or park bicycles in a manner which obstructs pedestrians.

Bikeway Obstruction (CVC 21211) No one may stop on or park a bicycle on a bicycle path.

Helmets (CVC 21212) Bicyclists and passengers under age 18 must wear an ANSI or Snell approved helmet when a passenger or riding upon a bicycle.

Direction of Travel (CVC 21650) Bicyclist must travel on the right side of the roadway in the direction of traffic.

21650 (g) was added March 2013 and this is an indication they can ride in the crosswalk
This section does not prohibit the operation of bicycles on any shoulder of a highway, on any sidewalk, on any bicycle path within a highway, or along any crosswalk or bicycle path crossing, where the operation is not otherwise prohibited by this code or local ordinance.

Freeways (CVC 21960) Bicyclists may not ride on the freeways where prohibited.

Toll Bridges (CVC 23330) Bicyclists may not cross a toll bridge unless permitted by signs.

Head Phones (CVC 27400) Bicyclists may not wear earplugs in both ears or a headset covering both ears, except hearing aids.

Biker Rules–Los Angeles City Municipal Code

LAMC 26.01a
Bicycle Defined
“any device upon which a person may ride which is propelled in whole or in part by human power through a system of belts, chains, or gears and which has either two or three wheels…”

LAMC 56.15 BICYCLE RIDING – SIDEWALKS.
(Amended by Ord. No. 148,990, Eff. 12/17/76.)

1. No person shall ride, operate or use a bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, cart, wagon, wheelchair, roller skates, or any other device moved exclusively by human power, on a sidewalk, bikeway or boardwalk in a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property. (Amended by Ord. No. 166,189, Eff. 10/7/90.)

2. No person shall ride, operate or use a bicycle or unicycle on Ocean Front Walk between Marine Street and Via Marina within the City of Los Angeles, except that bicycle or unicycle riding shall be permitted along the bicycle path adjacent to Ocean Front Walk between Marine Street and Washington Boulevard. (Amended by Ord. No. 153,474, Eff. 4/12/80.)

3. No person shall operate on a beach bicycle path, or on an area of a beach which is set aside for bicycle or unicycle use, any bicycle or tricycle which provides for side-by-side seating thereon or which has affixed thereto any attachment or appendage which protrudes from the side of the bicycle or tricycle and is used or designed to carry another person or persons thereon.

4. For the purposes of this section motorized bicycles as defined by Section 406 of the California Vehicle Code shall be included within the terms “motor vehicle” as defined in Section 415 of the Vehicle Code and as used in Section 21663 of the Vehicle Code.

Skateboarder Rules–Los Angeles City Municipal Code

LAMC 56.15.1 USE OF SKATEBOARDS
(Amended by Ord. No. 182,389, Eff. 3/17/13)

(a) “Skateboard” defined. As used in this chapter, a skateboard is any board or other flat object which has wheels attached to it by any means whatsoever and which is intended to be propelled by pushing, pulling, body movement, or gravity and to which there is not affixed any device or mechanism for steering.

(b) Skateboarding prohibited at specified locations. The City Council may, by ordinance, specify certain public roadways, public sidewalks, public parking lots and other public property, or portions thereof, on which skateboarding shall be prohibited.

(c) Skateboarding on public property. Persons riding on skateboards on public roadways, public sidewalks, public parking lots and other public property shall comply with the following requirements and restrictions:

1. Skateboarding in the upright position. Persons riding on skateboards shall do so only in the upright, standing position. Using, pushing, propelling or riding on a skateboard in a sitting, prone, kneeling or lying position is prohibited.

2. Traffic controls. Persons riding on skateboards on public roadways shall obey all speed limits, stop signs, signal lights, and other traffic controls that govern right-of-way.

3. Yielding to traffic in same direction. Persons riding on skateboards on public roadways shall ride close to the far-right edge of the roadway, and shall yield to vehicles approaching from the rear by moving to the right curb or shoulder of the roadway.

4. Uncontrolled intersections. When approaching an uncontrolled intersection, persons riding on skateboards on public roadways or public sidewalks shall yield to vehicles that are so near as to present a hazard and shall not cross the intersection at a speed in excess of ten (10) miles per hour.

5. Manner of operation. No person shall operate a skateboard recklessly or in such a manner or at such a speed as to cause or threaten to cause injury to himself or herself or to others, to create an obstruction or to present a hazard to the free use of public property by other pedestrians or motorists.

6. Attaching to or towing by vehicle. A person operating a skateboard shall not attach the same or himself or herself to any motor vehicle on the roadway. In addition, a person shall not knowingly drive a motor vehicle that is towing a person riding upon a skateboard.

(d) Penalty for violations. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate or fail to comply with the provisions of this section. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to fines as established by the City Council.

Should Venice get more police as temperature rises?

Venetians know traffic increases proportionately to the increase in temperature at the beach and the season has nothing to do with it. But what about police? With more people at the beach having fun, shouldn’t there be more police?

Mark Ryavec, president of Venice Stakeholders Association, has something to say about that.

His words are in reaction to “Is Charlie Beck a Climate-Change Denier” in the first print version of Yo Venice.

By Mark Ryavec
This might appear to be an odd question, but it
has significant implications for the safety of residents
and visitors in Venice.

Anyone who has lived here for the last three
decades, as I have, knows that the weather we have
been having is bizarre. Cool and rainy is the historical
weather in winter and early spring. But since
Jan. 1 we have had 18 days above 77 degrees and 10
days above 84 degrees. We hit 93 on March 14.

These conditions draw many of Los Angeles
County’s 10 million residents to the beach to cool
off, and a good proportion of them come to Venice.
Estimates range from 11 to 16 million visitors
annually. This causes a severe strain on public
safety, one that is apparently not understood at the
highest levels of the Los Angeles Police Department.
It appears that Chief Charlie Beck and his
management team do not accept that climate patterns
have changed and that visitor flow to Venice
has increased with it.

Two LAPD officers recently told me that on
these very hot days they are “slammed” and cannot
keep up with the situation. The huge increase in
visitors requires that they focus on gang suppression,
traffic violations, accidents, an increase in
crime, more radio calls, etc.

This distracts them from enforcing quality-of-life
ordinances that are important to residents, like
the ban on open alcohol containers in public,
harassment of residents, trespass on private property,
public defecation and urination, drug dealing,
illegal camping along Venice Beach and total
blockage of sidewalks by transient encampments, a
violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
This is because enforcing these laws will usually
take two officers off the beach for at least half a day
to transport and book the offenders. The Beach
Detail commander and officers have told me that
officers cannot in good conscience be absent from
Venice when the visitor numbers skyrocket.

The LAPD focus on visitors has other ramifications.
For example, a plan to fully enforce the 12-
5 am Beach Curfew and the ban on camping in the
Venice Beach Recreation Area – including an
LAPD presence in the Venice Beach Recreation
Area (VBRA) at 4 am – is on hold due to the diversion
of staffing to daytime hours. The result is that
the VBRA continues to be a powerful magnet for
transients from across the nation, including a percentage
of criminals, mentally ill and the drug-addled.

On a recent stroll along Venice Beach at
5 am, I counted at least 26 people camping in tents,
lean-tos or out in the open in sleeping bags. (Due to
the poor lighting there may have been many more
that I could not see.) It only takes one of these disaffected
transients in a drugged-out state to lose it
and someone gets hurt or killed, as we saw with the
vehicle assault that left Italian newlywed Alice
Gruppioni dead and 16 people injured on the
Boardwalk less than two years ago. And as we witnessed
just recently when a transient bit off the tip
of the finger of Clabe Hartley, the owner of the
Cow’s End restaurant on Washington Boulevard.
The transient had been harassing Hartley’s customers.
When Hartley moved in to defend his customers,
the transient attacked him – with his teeth.

As many Venetians know, Venice receives a
summer compliment of about 35 additional officers
starting with Memorial Day. (Some years ago,
when there were several incidents of gang-related
violence on the Boardwalk, the number was
higher). The purpose of the additional officers is to
cope with the huge increase in visitors drawn by
warmer weather and school vacations. And to prevent
gang conflicts that can quickly careen out of
control and cause harm to innocent bystanders.
With the very hot temperatures we’ve been
seeing, the LAPD should have followed the crowds
and implemented demand staffing that automatically
put additional officers in Venice when the
temperature is predicted to go over 74 degrees.

Captain Nicole Alberca, the new commander
of Pacific Division, told me recently that she had
requested additional staffing for hot days but been
told by LAPD headquarters to find the officers by
reassigning within Pacific Division. But the visitors
are largely from other parts of Los Angeles or the
County’s other 87 cities, not from just Pacific Division.
If the increased summer staffing is to address
the increase in visitors than logically Venice
deserves the increase whenever the temps go over
74 degrees. There is even a good argument that
County sheriffs should also be posted here since a
large number of visitors are not from the City of
Los Angeles but rather from other cities in the
County of Los Angeles or from points farther
away.

Captain Alberca acknowledged that when
thousands of our inland neighbors seek relief in
Venice from extreme temperatures, the LAPD
presence is very thin in comparison with the size of
the crowds and that attention to resident concerns
suffers.

We have long passed the time that City and
County leaders should have realized that Venice is
the most popular, free recreational destination in
Southern California and that it requires significantly
more police resources from both the City and
County whenever temperatures go up, which is
now happening more frequently due to climate
change.

LUPC Cancelled

Chair Robin Rudisill sent notification late last night that there would not be a Tuesday Land Use and Planning committee (LUPC) meet due to lack of quorum.