web analytics

Rss

Venice News Updates

News of Venice, CA and Marina del Rey CA

VSA Reports MTA Proposed “Bridge Housing” Must Get Coastal Development Permit

(Venice, CA/9-19-18) The California Coastal Commission announced Monday, September 17, that any new homeless shelter proposed in the Coastal Zone of Venice will be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit (CDP).

This statement came in an electronic message to John Henning, attorney for Venice Stakeholders Association (VSA). Henning had earlier written to the Commission to ask for confirmation of the VSA’s opinion that nothing in the State’s new emergency shelter statute exempts shelters from the Coastal Act, which requires a Coastal Development Permit for any “development” in the Coastal Zone, however minor.

“The proposed Venice Homeless Shelters are not exempt from coastal development permit requirements. Each proposed project will require some type of Coastal Commission review,” stated Charles Posner, Supervisor of Planning for the commission, in his message to Henning.

Mark Ryavec, president of Venice Stakeholders, said, “We are encouraged by this confirmation of the Coastal Act’s jurisdiction over such a large development as the 100-person shelter envisioned by Councilman Bonin for the former MTA bus lot on Main Street. “

“The CDP requirement will automatically trigger an environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act and force the city to quantify and mitigate effects such as traffic, public safety, aesthetics, and noise, especially night time noise, and parking demand.”

“Considering that some of the 100 homeless will include “car campers” who arrive with their vehicles, the City will have to provide a place to park them without taking street parking from visitors and existing residents.”

The CDP and CEQA processes will also force the city to consider alternative sites and give residents a formal hearing in which to comment on the proposal, which Councilman Bonin has to date refused to allow.

Ryavec Provides Letter Sent to Bonin Requesting CDP, EIR, and Questions Zoning for MTA Lot

14 June 2018. Mark Ryavec, president of the Venice Stakeholders Association, sent the letter to Councilman Mike Bonin stating that the proposed use of the Metro (MTA) site as a homeless shelter requires a Coastal Development Permit from both the City and the Coastal Commission and a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

In addition the letter questions whether the M1 zoning of the site allows for a homeless shelter on land not presently owned or leased by the City. The letter was written by John Henning who is the attorney for the Venice Stakeholders Association.

Here is the letter. Letter Henning to Bonin re Venice Shelter 6-11-18

VSA Appeals Public Nuisance Lawsuit Against City

(Venice, CA/11-6-17) The Venice Stakeholders Association (VSA) has filed its appeal brief in its lawsuit against the City and County of Los Angeles for maintaining a dangerous public nuisance along the Venice Boardwalk and Venice Beach Recreation Area, the public park that stretches from the Santa Monica border to the Marina del Rey jetty.

The VSA’s action is an attempt by residents “to stop the City and County of Los Angeles from maintaining truly disturbing nuisances on their property which have far reaching implications for the health and safety of residents…”

The case arose from a verified complaint alleging (among other things) that the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles are each maintaining nuisances by, among other things, leaving health and safety hazards in open public spaces, including trash, feces, tampons, drug paraphernalia, human sewage, excrement, blood, urine, sleeping bags, bed rolls, tents, tarps, hammocks, camping equipment, umbrellas, canopies, furniture, canvasses, merchandise, bikes, carts, and more.

The City and County have disputed this, contending they are keeping the area reasonably clean, but plaintiffs submitted evidence contradicting the City and County’s claims of regular maintenance and removal of the hazardous materials.

The evidence in this case presents a classic disputed issue of material fact which precludes summary judgment.

Venice Stakeholders also allege the city is allowing other nuisances on its property, including regular drug use, crimes, excessively loud noises, harassment, vandalism of surrounding properties, illegal camping on public property, regular blocking of sidewalks by bulky items, and many more specific, intolerable conditions visited upon plaintiffs and residents of Venice.